Literate Perversions

  • Home
  • Speak Out!
  • Writing
    • Times Square: A History of Sin
    • God Is A Bullet
    • Looking At My Cock
    • Two Women, One Year, and Hep C
    • Beautiful Scars
    • The St. James Infirmary: A Safe Medical Haven for Sex Workers
    • Sexy Beasts! A Look at Vampires in Porn
    • Review: The Good Old Naughty Days
    • Fencesitter Blues
    • The Barbary Coast
    • Review: Roman Sex
    • Sex and Death in Four Colors

Why Edwards?

By Chris Hall
January 19, 2008
3 Comments

Tweet

If you want to know why I’m going to vote for John Edwards instead of choosing Tweedledee (Clinton) or Tweedledum (Obama), this is all you really need:

HENDERSON, NEV. — John Edwards ripped Barack Obama for praising the way Ronald Reagan brought about change when he was President of the United States.

“When you think about what Ronald Reagan did to the American people, to the middle class to the working people,” said Edwards.

“He was openly – openly – intolerant of unions and the right to organize. He openly fought against the union and the organized labor movement in this country. He openly did extraordinary damage to the middle class and working people, created a tax structure that favored the very wealthiest Americans and caused the middle class and working people to struggle every single day. The destruction of the environment, you know, eliminating regulation of companies that were polluting and doing extraordinary damage to the environment.”

“I can promise you this: this president will never use Ronald Reagan as an example for change.”

[Read more…]

Tweet

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: election, John Edwards, Ronald-Reagan

The True Stripes of a "Maverick"

By Chris Hall
March 18, 2007
Leave a Comment

Tweet

The following should be enough reason alone to prevent John McCain from ever being president. Or, for that matter, holding any kind of public office ever again.

Reporter: Should U.S. taxpayer money go to places like Africa to fund contraception to prevent AIDS

Mr. McCain: Well I think it’s a combination. The guy I really respect on this is Dr. Coburn. He believes — and I was just reading the thing he wrote — that you should do what you can to encourage abstinence where there is going to be sexual activity. Where that doesn�t succeed, than he thinks that we should employ contraceptives as well. But I agree with him that the first priority is on abstinence. I look to people like Dr. Coburn. I’m not very wise on it.

(Mr. McCain turns to take a question on Iraq, but a moment later looks back to the reporter who asked him about AIDS.)

Mr. McCain: I haven’t thought about it. Before I give you an answer, let me think about. Let me think about it a little bit because I never got a question about it before. I don’t know if I would use taxpayers’ money for it.

Q: What about grants for sex education in the United States? Should they include instructions about using contraceptives? Or should it be Bush’s policy, which is just abstinence?

Mr. McCain: (Long pause) Ahhh. I think I support the president’s policy.

Q: So no contraception, no counseling on contraception. Just abstinence. Do you think contraceptives help stop the spread of HIV?

Mr. McCain: (Long pause) You’ve stumped me.

Q: I mean, I think you’d probably agree it probably does help stop it?

Mr. McCain: (Laughs) Are we on the Straight Talk express? I’m not informed enough on it. Let me find out. You know, I’m sure I’ve taken a position on it on the past. I have to find out what my position was. Brian, would you find out what my position is on contraception — I’m sure I’m opposed to government spending on it, I’m sure I support the president’s policies on it.

Q: But you would agree that condoms do stop the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Would you say: “No, we’re not going to distribute them,” knowing that?

Mr. McCain: (Twelve-second pause) Get me Coburn’s thing, ask Weaver to get me Coburn’s paper that he just gave me in the last couple of days. I’ve never gotten into these issues before.

AIDS was first identified in 1981. Six years and some 30,000 deaths later, President Ronald Reagan publicly spoke about AIDS for the first time. Because of his loyalty to ancient sexual mores, the Gipper stood by while people died, left and right. They were expendable because they were faggots and junkies and people who wouldn’t keep it in their pants.

AIDS is not as fatal as it was then, but it’s still a threat. And there are other dangers; the old-fashioned STI’s are still out there, like syphillis, gonorrhea, and HPV. The biggest one, though, is ignorance. Twenty years after Reagan finally got the word “AIDS” past his lips, the government is still functioning on policies that pander to people who think that it’s better that their children get lethal diseases than have sex. Worse, to sustain those policies, they have to deny outright scientific truth, such as the ironclad FACT that condoms do reduce transmission of STI’s.

McCain got this far on a reputation as a plain-speaking maverick who wasn’t afraid to speak the truth. He’s shown that he’s unable to speak the truth about people dying in Iraq, and now he’s unable to speak a truth as plain and elementary as this. We can’t afford another president who stands by while people die.

Tweet

Filed Under: Politics, Sex and Gender Tagged With: AIDS, condoms, John-McCain, Ronald-Reagan

Recent Posts

  • We Need to Fight the (Police) Unions For Justice in Law Enforcement
  • Hooray for Femme Superheroes: Supergirl’s Skirt is Badass
  • Infographic: Police are Threats to Sex Workers, Not Protection
  • A Song Stripped Naked: The Be Good Tanyas Version of “Waiting Around to Die”
  • Steven Pressfield and Impostor’s Syndrome

Copyright © 2021 ·Metro Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in

✖

Cancel reply

Connect with:
Google Twitter Yahoo! Tumblr Windows Live

Cancel